<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>VMtoday &#187; NIC</title> <atom:link href="http://vmtoday.com/tag/nic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://vmtoday.com</link> <description>VMware News, Views, &#38; How-To&#039;s from vExpert Josh Townsend</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>vSphere 5 Networking Bug Affects Software iSCSI</title><link>http://vmtoday.com/2012/02/vsphere-5-networking-bug-affects-software-iscsi/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vsphere-5-networking-bug-affects-software-iscsi</link> <comments>http://vmtoday.com/2012/02/vsphere-5-networking-bug-affects-software-iscsi/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Joshua Townsend</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Issues & Troubleshooting]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VMware How To]]></category> <category><![CDATA[esxi 5]]></category> <category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category> <category><![CDATA[network]]></category> <category><![CDATA[networking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NIC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[troubleshooting]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vDS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vmknic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vmnic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vsphere 5]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vswitch]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vmtoday.com/?p=854</guid> <description><![CDATA[Update: This issue was fixed as of 3/15/2012 in ESXi 5.0 Update 1 per the original knowledge base article: VMware KB 2008144. To download ESXi 5.0/vCenter Server 5.0 Update 1, see the VMware Download Center.  &#160; I recently stumbled on two vSphere 5 ESXi networking bugs that I thought I would share. The issues are very [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>Update: This issue was fixed as of 3/15/2012 in ESXi 5.0 Update 1 per the original knowledge base article: <a
href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=2008144">VMware KB 2008144</a>. To download ESXi 5.0/vCenter Server 5.0 Update 1, see the <a
href="http://downloads.vmware.com/d/info/datacenter_cloud_infrastructure/vmware_vsphere/5_0" target="_blank">VMware Download Center</a>. </strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I recently stumbled on two vSphere 5 ESXi networking bugs that I thought I would share. The issues are very similar from a cursory level, but have different symptoms, troubleshooting steps, and implications for your architecture, so I’m going to split the issues into two separate posts. Because troubleshooting these issues was a real pain, I’ll provide some details on how to identify these issues in your environments and wrap up with a third post on what I believe to be some best practices to avoid these same problems and achieve greater redundancy and resiliency in your vSphere environments.</p><p><strong><span
style="text-decoration: underline;">The Problem</span></strong></p><p>Today, we’ll look at an ESXi 5 networking issue that caused massive iSCSI latency, lost iSCSI sessions, and lost network connectivity. I’ve been able to reproduce this issue in several environments, on different hardware configurations. Here’s the background information on how all this started: I upgraded an ESXi 4.1 host to ESXi 5 using vSphere Update Manager (VUM). Note that I did use the host upgrade image that contained the <a
href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=2007108">ESXi500-201109001 iSCSI fixes</a> – if you are upgrading to vSphere 5 and have iSCSI in your environment, use this image. Here’s a quick look at how the networking was configured on this host:</p><p>The iSCSI networking was configured in a very typical setup, and per best practices, as outline in <a
href="http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-50/topic/com.vmware.vsphere.storage.doc_50/GUID-8AE88758-20C1-4873-99C7-181EF9ACFA70.html">VMware’s documentation</a>, as well as from many vendors (see EMC’s Chad Sakac’s ‘<a
href="http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2009/09/a-multivendor-post-on-using-iscsi-with-vmware-vsphere.html">A Multivendor Post on using iSCSI with VMware vSphere</a>’), with two vmnic uplinks, two vmknics, with one active adapter on the correct layer-2/layer-3 network, and the other unused.</p><p><a
href="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iSCSI1-config1.jpg" rel="lightbox[854]"><img
class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-864" title="vSwitch iSCSI vmknic override failover order with unused NIC" src="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iSCSI1-config1.jpg" alt="vSwitch iSCSI vmknic override failover order with unused NIC" width="533" height="602" /></a><a
href="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iscsi2-config1.jpg" rel="lightbox[854]"><img
class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-863" title="vSwitch iSCSI vmknic override failover order with unused NIC" src="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iscsi2-config1.jpg" alt="vSwitch iSCSI vmknic override failover order with unused NIC" width="533" height="602" /></a></p><p>After the upgrade, the standard vSwitch with two vmnics for uplinks (Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 1000Base-T) and two vmknics that serviced the software iSCSI adapter failed to pass traffic (vmkping to the iSCSI targets failed) and could not mount ANY iSCSI LUN&#8217;s. VM network, management, and vMotion ports were not affected.</p><p>If I let the host sit long enough, it *might* find a couple paths to the storage, but even then performance was deteriorated per the vmkernel.log:</p><pre>WARNING: ScsiDeviceIO: 1218: Device naa.60026b90003dcebb000003ca4af95792 performance has deteriorated. I/O latency increased from average value of 5619 microseconds to 495292 microseconds.</pre><p><strong><span
style="text-decoration: underline;">Troubleshooting</span></strong></p><p>I’m going to dump a whole bunch of my troubleshooting steps on you – hopefully they not only help folks dealing with this particular bug, but help with general network and configuration troubleshooting in VMware vSphere. During troubleshooting, I removed the vmk binding for these two on the iSCSI adapter, removed the software iSCSI Adapter itself, removed the vmknics on the vSwitch, and removed the vSwitch itself. I then recreated the vSwitch, set vSwitch MTU to 9000, recreated two vmk ports, set 9000MTU, assigned IP, and set failover order for multipath iSCSI. I then re-created the software iSCSI adapter and bound the two vmk ports. I was able to pass vmk traffic and mount iSCSI LUN&#8217;s. Great – problem solved!?!?! Not so much &#8211; I rebooted the host and the problem returned.</p><p>Here are my next troubleshooting steps:</p><ul><li>I repeated the procedure above and re-gained connectivity, but the problem returns on subsequent reboots. I can verifiably recreate the problem.</li><li>I verified end-to-end connectivity for other hosts on the same Layer 1, Layer 2, and Layer 3 network as the iSCSI initiator and iSCSI targets.</li><li>I verified the ESXi host’s networking configuration using the vSphere client, double-checking the vSwitch, vmnic uplinks, and vmknic configurations. Everything looked good so I canceled out.</li><li>I then reinstalled ESXi from scratch (maybe something was left over from 4.1 that a clean install would weed out), built up the same configuration, and was again able to re-create the problem.</li><li>I poured over logs (vmkernel.log, syslog.log and storagerm.log primarily). I could see an intermittent loss of storage connectivity, failure to log into the storage targets (duh – there is no connectivity, no vmkping) and high storage latency on hosts where I had rebuilt the iSCSI stack and run a few VM’s.</li><li>I switched out the Broadcom NIC for an Intel NIC (the Broadcom had hardware iSCSI capabilities – I wanted to be sure the hardware iSCSI was not interfering).</li><li>I verified TOE was enabled.</li></ul><p><strong><span
style="text-decoration: underline;">The ‘Ah-Ha’ Moment</span></strong></p><p>Next, I verified the ESXi host’s networking configuration using the vSphere client one more time – the properties of the vSwitch, the properties of the vmkernel (vmk) ports, the manual NIC teaming overrides, IP addressing, etc. Everything looked correct – I MADE NO CHANGES – but when I clicked <strong><span
style="text-decoration: underline;">OK</span></strong> (last time I canceled) to close the vSwitch properties and was greeted with this warning:</p><p><a
href="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/changing-an-iscsi-initiator-port-group-warning.jpg" rel="lightbox[854]"><img
class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-855" title="changing an iscsi initiator port group warning" src="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/changing-an-iscsi-initiator-port-group-warning.jpg" alt="changing an iscsi initiator port group warning" width="480" height="214" /></a></p><p>Wait a second… I didn’t change anything, why am I being prompted with a you’re ‘Changing an iSCSI Initiator Port Group’ warning? I like to live dangerously, and wanted to see what would happen, so I said ‘Yes’.</p><p>Much to my surprise, after only viewing and closing the vSwitch and iSCSI vmk port group settings, I was able to complete a vmkping on the iSCSI-bound vmk’s. And moreover, I completed a Rescan of all storage adapters and my iSCSI LUN’s were found, mounted, and ready for use. Problem solved? Nope. The same ugly issue re-appeared after a reboot.</p><p>While the problem wasn’t solved, I now had something to work with. My go-to troubleshooting question “What Changed?” could maybe be answered. Even though I didn’t change anything in the vSwitch Properties GUI, something changed. To see what changed in the background, I compared the output of the following ESXi Shell (or vCLI, or PowerCLI) commands before and after making ‘the change’ happen (by viewing the properties of the vSwitch/vmk ports), but found no changes.</p><ul><li>esxcfg-vswitch -l</li><li>esxcfg-vmknic -l</li><li>esxcfg-nics -l</li></ul><p>Then, I made backup copy of esx.conf</p><pre> cp /etc/vmware/esx.conf /etc/vmware/esx.conf.bak</pre><p>Then I caused ‘the change’ and then compared checksums using md5sum, but found no differences:</p><pre> md5sum /etc/vmware/esx.conf /etc/vmware/esx.conf.bak</pre><p>I compared the running .conf and the backup .conf, but found no differences:</p><pre> diff /etc/vmware/esx.conf /etc/vmware/esx.conf.bak</pre><p><strong><span
style="text-decoration: underline;">Call in Air Support</span></strong><br
/> At this point, I was out of ideas so I called for help: “Hello, 1-866-4VMWARE, option 4, option 2 – help!”</p><p>After repeating many of the same troubleshooting steps, the support engineer decided that I had hit on a known, and not yet patched, bug. The details of the bug are included in <a
title="Incorrect NIC failback occurs when an unused uplink is present" href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=2008144" target="_blank">KB 2008144: Incorrect NIC failback occurs when an unused uplink is present</a>. That’s right – my iSCSI traffic, vmkpings, etc were being sent down the wrong NIC – the <em>UNUSED</em> NIC. Ouch. The bug caused the networking stack to behave in a very unpredictable way, making my troubleshooting steps next to useless, and any other advanced troubleshooting ideas I had (sniffing, logs, etc.)</p><p>Once I knew what the issue was, I could see a bit of evidence in the logs:</p><pre>WARNING: VMW_SATP_LSI: satp_lsi_pathIsUsingPreferredController:714:Failed to get volume access control data for path "vmhba33:C0:T0:L4": No connection

NMP: nmp_DeviceUpdatePathStates:547: Activated path "<span style="color: #ff0000;">NULL</span>" for NMP device "naa.60026b90003dcebb0000c7454d5cc946".

WARNING: ScsiPath: 3576: Path vmhba33:C0:T0:L4 is being removed</pre><p>Notice the <span
style="color: #ff0000;">NULL</span> path – the path can’t be interpreted correctly when being sent down the wrong (unsued) vmnic that is on a different subnet and VLAN. The gotcha on this issue is that I had followed best practices where applicable, and accepted default settings on the vSwitch and vmknics.</p><p><strong><span
style="text-decoration: underline;">The Quick Fix</span></strong><br
/> <a
title="Incorrect NIC failback occurs when an unused uplink is present" href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=2008144" target="_blank">VMware KB 2008144</a> offers two workaround for this bug. The quick fix for the problem is to simply change the Failback setting on either the vSwitch running the software iSCSI vmknic’s to “<strong>No</strong>” (default is yes), or to change the setting on the vmknic itself if you have other port groups on the vSwitch (such as a VM Network port group to give your guest VM’s access to the iSCSI network).</p><p><a
href="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/failback-No.jpg" rel="lightbox[854]"><img
class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-859" title="Change vSwitch or Portgroup Failback" src="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/failback-No.jpg" alt="Change vSwitch or Portgroup Failback" width="536" height="663" /></a></p><p>Changing Failback = No on the iSCSI vmknics and then rescanning the storage adapters fix the glitch immediately.</p><p><strong><span
style="text-decoration: underline;">Architecture Changes</span></strong><br
/> The second workaround from VMware is “Do not have any unused NICs present in the team.”. This translates to a slightly different architecture than that described in many documents. To achieve this workaround, the configuration would have to change to two vSwitches, each with a single vmnic uplink and a single vmk port, bound to the iSCSI adapter. This change does not impact redundancy or availability when compared with the single-vSwitch:two-vmk configuration that I was running with as one of the vmnics was set to unused anyway. This workaround does add a bit more complexity, as there are a few more elements to configure, monitor, manage, and document.</p><p>This problem seems to only present itself on vSphere Standard Switches (vSwitch), although I could not get confirmation of this (please post a comment if you know!). Assuming this is true, a vDistributed Switch (vDS) could be used for Software iSCSI traffic. Mike Foley has a write-up on how to migrate iSCSI from a vSwitch to a vDS on his blog here: <a
title="Dr. iSCSI or How I learned to stop worrying and love virtual distributed switches on vSphere V5" href="http://www.yelof.com/?p=72" target="_blank">http://www.yelof.com/?p=72</a>.</p><p><strong><span
style="text-decoration: underline;">A Couple More Notes</span></strong><br
/> My troubleshooting fix of viewing the vSwitch settings and clicking ok seemed to temporarily resolve the issues because it triggered an up/down event on the vmk of the unused uplink. This caused the network stack to re-evaluate paths and start using the correct, Active, uplink.</p><p>Note that this problem can occur outside of my iSCSI use case – any vSwitch, Port Group, or VMKNIC with an unused adapter set in the NIC Teaming Failover Order are susceptible to this bug, so watch for it on redundant vMotion networks (vMotion randomly fails), VM Network networks (sudden loss of guest connectivity), or even your management network (hosts fall out of manageability from vCenter, and can’t be contacted via SSH, vSphere client, etc.<br
/> Leave a comment if you’ve experienced this bug – your notes on the problem may help others find and fix the issue until VMware releases a fix. I understand that a fix for this particular bug is not due out until at least vSphere 5 Update 1.</p><p>I&#8217;ll have another (shorter) writeup on the 2nd networking bug I found in ESXi 5 later in the week &#8211; check back here for a link once it is published.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://vmtoday.com/2012/02/vsphere-5-networking-bug-affects-software-iscsi/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>26</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>vSphere Upgrade Breaks Active Directory</title><link>http://vmtoday.com/2009/11/vsphere-upgrade-breaks-active-directory/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vsphere-upgrade-breaks-active-directory</link> <comments>http://vmtoday.com/2009/11/vsphere-upgrade-breaks-active-directory/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:40:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Joshua Townsend</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Issues & Troubleshooting]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[active directory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[DHCP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NIC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category> <category><![CDATA[upgrade virtual hardware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vsphere]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vmtoday.com/?p=249</guid> <description><![CDATA[I recently completed a VMware VI 3.5 to vSphere upgrade in a small environment (5 hosts, 80 VM&#8217;s).  Being a small environment, the upgrade was planned for one big overnight blitz.  Unfortunately, the size of the environment did not afford a test environment to uncover potential issues before the upgrade.  The upgrade to vSphere itself [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I recently completed a VMware VI 3.5 to vSphere upgrade in a small environment (5 hosts, 80 VM&#8217;s).  Being a small environment, the upgrade was planned for one big overnight blitz.  Unfortunately, the size of the environment did not afford a test environment to uncover potential issues before the upgrade.  The upgrade to vSphere itself went swimmingly (the vCenter server had been upgraded a couple weeks earlier).  However, some things in the environment started to go wonky once the upgrade was complete.  Specifically, name resolution (DNS), DHCP, WINS, Group Policy, and really anything Microsoft Active Directory related just did not work.</p><p>Let me explain a bit about the environment so you can better understand what the problem was and how it was corrected.  The environment was an all Microsoft shop, except for VMware of course.  The company follows a virtualize-first policy and is about 90% virtualized, including the Active Directory Domain Controllers.  The DC&#8217;s are Windows 2008 and serve up DHCP, DNS, and WINS in addition to their Directory Services roles.</p><p>The problems really began after I upgraded the virtual hardware version from v4 to v7 (check out page 97 of the <a
href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsphere4/r40/vsp_40_upgrade_guide.pdf">vSphere Upgrade Guide</a> for the upgrade procedure).  When a Windows server is upgrade from VMware Hardware Version 4 to 7, the VMware Upgrade Helper Service handles the reconfiguration of network adapters on the upgraded virtual machine.  The VMware Upgrade Helper Service is installed with VMware Tools and is one of the reasons, along with getting drivers installed for the new hardware, for upgrading VMware Tools before upgrading the hardware version.  If you review the Event Viewer Application log on an upgraded machine you will see several entries from VMUpgradeHelper (Source) with several different Event ID&#8217;s (26, 280, 272, 108, &amp; 105).  An examination of these events will show that the VMware Upgrade Helper service 1.) Backed up the network configuration at OS shutdown, 2.) Started Automatically with the OS, 3.) Checks the device ID for the network adapter, 4.) If the device ID has changed (as a result of a hardware upgrade), the backed up configuration is restored and Event ID 269 is logged.</p><p>This behavior should be transparent for most configurations, with the exception of a slightly longer boot time following the upgrade.  However, I did notice a few problems with the NIC settings being restored under certain conditions.  First, on servers with a statically configured IPv4 stack, IP addresses and DNS server addresses were restored, but the WINS server addresses were not restored.  I suspect this is an oversight in the VMware Upgrade Helper service, but is probably not a major issue for many servers/environments as WINS is infrequently used.  However, for a WINS server itself to lose its configuration to use itself as a WINS server, <a
href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=what+happens+when+a+WINS+server+doesn%27t+use+itself+as+a+WINS+server" target="_blank">bad things happen</a>.  There are several ways to correct this &#8211; scripts, DHCP Options, etc.  In the end, this wasn&#8217;t really a show stopper for me in this small environment.</p><p>The second, and bigger issue for me, was that after the virtual hardware was upgraded and the VMware Upgrade Helper Service did it&#8217;s job my Active Directory and related services were not available.  DNS was not functioning, DHCP was not handing out addresses, and I couldn&#8217;t connect to AD using ADUC, GPMC or LDAP.  It took me a few minutes to figure out what was going on.  This seems to be what happened: the virtual hardware upgrade caused a new virtual network adapter to be installed in the VM and all of the settings, including the MAC, address to be restored.  The HW v4 NIC was removed from the machine, but Windows held onto the device as a &#8216;ghost NIC&#8217; in Device Manager.  The core AD services, including DNS and DHCP, were still attempting to bind to the ghost NIC.  This behavior persisted through service restarts and reboots of the guest.  It wasn&#8217;t until I examined the IP configuration on the new NIC and clicked Apply (instead of canceling out) that I was prompted with a message indicating that there was more than one network interface configured with the same IP address, queuing me into the solution.</p><p>The error message should be familiar to anyone who has performed a Physical-to-Virtual migration (P2V) and is easily corrected by removing the old device through Windows Device Manager.  The device is hidden so you first have to expose it before deleting it.  Check <a
href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/315539" target="_blank">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/315539</a> for details or simply follow my instructions below.  To expose the non-present NIC, open a command prompt and enter:</p><blockquote><p>set devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices=1</p></blockquote><p>You can then open Device Manager (enter <em>devmgmt.msc</em> at the command prompt to save some time).  In Device Manager, click View | Show Hidden Devices.  Expand Network Adapters and find the grayed-out entry for the old NIC as pictured below.</p><p
style="text-align: center;"><a
href="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/GhostNIC1.JPG" rel="lightbox[249]"><img
class="size-full wp-image-262 aligncenter" title="GhostNIC" src="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/GhostNIC1.JPG" alt="GhostNIC" width="357" height="256" /></a></p><p
style="text-align: left;">Select the ghost NIC and right-click | Uninstall to remove it.</p><p>The final gotcha for me on this is that the set devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices=1 command does not work on Windows 2008 (or Vista, Windows 7, or Windows 2008 R2).  To see and remove ghost NICs from Windows 2008, and environmental variable must be defined.  To set the variable, open Server Manager from the Windows Start Menu.  Highlight &#8216;Server Manager (%SERVERNAME%)&#8217; in the left-side tree-view pane.  Click &#8216;Change System Properties&#8217; in the right-hand pane.  Switch to the Advanced tab and click &#8216;Environment Variables.  Create a new System variable by clicking the New button.  The Variable name should be &#8216;devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices&#8217; and the value should be &#8217;1&#8242; as pictured below.</p><p><a
href="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/EnvVariable.JPG" rel="lightbox[249]"><img
class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-263" title="EnvVariable" src="http://cloudfront.vmtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/EnvVariable.JPG" alt="EnvVariable" width="349" height="139" /></a></p><p>Click OK to close out of any open Windows.  A reboot is not necessary for the variable to take effect, although you may have to close out of all open Device Manager Windows and then reopen devmgmt.msc.  Click View | Show Hidden Devices and remove the ghost NIC as described above.  A quick reboot after I removed the ghost NIC from the domain controllers and all Active Directory, DNS, DHCP, and WINS services immediately began operating normally.  This second issue is more of a Microsoft problem in my opinion, and has been around for some time.</p><p>Before you start getting all upset and the FUD starts flying (&#8220;this is Microsoft/VMware&#8217;s latest attempt to break VMware/Microsoft?&#8221;), it wasn&#8217;t really vSphere that broke Active Directory; It was me.  A little better planning and not rushing through the last wee hours of the upgrade Window could have saved some trouble.  If you are planning a similar upgrade, it would be best to upgrade your domain controllers/DNS servers one at a time and remediate the issues I have decribed before upgrading the next.  This will ensure continued availability of your Active Directory and other critical services during your upgrade.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://vmtoday.com/2009/11/vsphere-upgrade-breaks-active-directory/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>10</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/22 queries in 0.111 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 622/624 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cloudfront.vmtoday.com

Served from: vmtoday.com @ 2012-05-21 20:29:41 -->
